Broken mudstones from the Heather Formation, the sealing unit for many of the Brent reservoirs in the Northern North Sea. Photo: Henk Kombrink.
Geology & Geophysics

Hydrocarbon and seal properties are key

Better predicting the hydrocarbon phase of a prospect or in a basin as a whole requires more than knowing about the source rock and its maturity

Most commonly, Petro­leum Systems Analysis (PSA) studies tend to focus on source rock distribution, its quality, and the ther­mal regime of the basin to then model migration pathways and the associated hydrocarbon phase. This is also some­times referred to as ‘’Bottom-up’’ PSA, which predominantly depends on large uncertainties in the basin centres, away from well and data control.

However, this methodology can fall short when it comes to predicting the hy­drocarbon phase of prospects. As demon­strated by Zhiyong He, the variations in hydrocarbon properties such as phase, API and gas-to-liquids ratio (GLR) across a migration pathway are not necessarily related to maturity or local variations in source rock properties, but can be entire­ly explained by seal capacity.

In the example shown here, all the hydrocarbons of very different compo­sition have originated from the same expelled gas condensate. As the gas condensate reaches saturation pressure, oil begins to fractionate out. If the seal is compromised, excess gas leaks off vertically, leaving behind an under­filled oil accumulation.

Figure 1: Impact of the relationship between PVT data and seal properties on the hydrocarbon phase at the trap. Left: Phase diagram, Right: Generic migration pathway. Source: Modified after H E , Z . , 2020.

On the other hand, a competent seal allows for a gas column to accumu­late, which displaces the oil leg updip, leaving behind a fill to spill gas accu­mulation. As such, the occurrence of a filled-to-spill oil field only or a mixed phase accumulation is very unlikely. At the same time, it is those overoptimis­tic scenarios that are often assumed in prospect assessments.

As this example shows, it is the hydrocarbon properties or PVT (pres­sure, volume, temperature) data from already drilled exploration wells in a basin that form the critical piece of the puzzle. This type of data tends to be ne­glected in “Bottom-up” studies, and we therefore make a case for what we call a “Top Down” approach to be applied in PSA at the same time as the study of source rock generation over time.

Both the “Bottom-up” as well as the “Top Down” approaches enrich the understanding from opposite di­rections, and ideally result in consist­ent predictions of the exploration risk. ‘’Top-down’’ thinking must not only be integrated into any regional PSA study, but also into the prospect resource as­sessment, where a proper evaluation of the relationship between the PVT data and seal properties at the trap al­lows making probabilistic assumptions about the hydrocarbon phase and re­source volume uncertainty ranges.

Previous article
The Gambia’s offshore acreage is hot again

Related Articles