The instances where the class Fish-deep has been mislabeled as Batoidea. Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/.
Europe
Technology

Seabed mapping – let AI do the work

Trawling through footage looking for special seabed features can be a very timeconsuming task. Recent work has demonstrated that it can be done faster

“I spent days, if not weeks, trawling through high-resolution photos,” a geoscientist from an oil and gas company re­cently told me. Why did he do that? He carried out this task because of a new field develop­ment, which demanded a new gas pipeline to be built. Before that work can begin, it is common practice to have an ROV capture the trajectory in high-resolution photos and videos, resulting in a massive amount of data to be analysed.

The geoscientist de­scribed going through the photos one by one, describing what he saw and trying to find any obstacles or gullies that could compromise the in­tegrity of the pipeline. It all sounded like a mon­umental task, especially because of the amount of data available for analysis.

Mapping life

Then, totally independ­ent of this initial story, I saw a post on LI the oth­er day from Dani Schmid. He is the founder of Norway-based Bergwerk, a company that special­ises in developing tools that help minimise the impact of natural resource extraction.

One of the projects that Bergwerk has recent­ly been involved with is the use of seabed image­ry to automatically de­tect and classify marine benthic life. The main driver for the project is Norway’s ambition – or at least for some people in Norway – to start a seabed minerals industry. One of the key aspects of this future industry is the emphasis on environmen­tal monitoring; a detailed environmental baseline assessment will always be required before any activi­ty can take place.

In collaboration with Aker BP, an oil and gas company with a strong presence on the Norwe­gian Continental Shelf and a commitment to gathering and sharing seabed data, Bergwerk developed an AI-powered methodology to detect marine organisms charac­teristic of the North At­lantic region. The results were published earlier this year in Frontiers in Ma­rine Science.

The team used the so-called DeepSee dataset, which is a comprehensive collection of annotated im­ages from the Arctic Mid- Ocean Ridge, the Norwe­gian Sea, and the Greenland Sea. Designed to support the development of ML models capable of detecting and classifying benthic or­ganisms, the DeepSee object detection model was trained on this dataset.

Comparison between manually annotated (A) and detected labels (B) in an example image. Instances that are labelled in the ground truth image and not found by the DeepSee model, and vice-versa, are encircled in black. The average precision and recall of the model detections for the image are 0.72 and 0.83, respectively. However, it is evident that the ‘false positives’ detected by the model are indeed valid detections that were missed in the annotated dataset. When corrected, the average precision and recall increase to 1 and 0.91, respectively. Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/

Following rigorous testing, the workflow is now capable of processing vast amounts of footage quickly with high preci­sion and accuracy, iden­tifying most species that occur in the area. As such, the model provides a valu­able addition to the tradi­tional workflow of manual annotation by significant­ly reducing the load on marine biologists.

In the paper, the au­thors already mention the application of their workflow to pipeline lay­ing projects. And given the technology available, it should also be possible to expand the model’s capability and include the identification of drop stones that can form un­wanted obstacles for a pipeline that prefers to go straight ahead. It could have saved the ge­oscientist I spoke to quite some time.

Previous article
India – Andaman Islands – drilling update

Related Articles