In 2022, TMC successfully collected and brought aboard 4,500 tons of nodules during a pilot mining test. Photography: TMC.
Europe
Seabed Minerals

Crushing report on TMC’s deep-sea mining plans

Financial investigation firm Iceberg Research believes The Metals Company’s (TMC) plan to extract deep-sea nodules is flawed and compares the company to the failed Nautilus Minerals project

“We believe the economics of TMC’s operations are not viable and that the company will be a repeat of Nautilus. We expect Gerard Barron to leave the ship when this be­comes obvious, as he did with Nautilus.”

These are the conclud­ing words in Iceberg Re­search’ latest report on The Metals Company (TMC). The small, secretive firm is known in financial circles for its activist approach and short-selling reports on companies it believes to be overvalued, flawed, or fraudulent.

By the time the report was published, TMC’s stock had soared 290 % year-to-date, fuelled by its pivot to US permits un­der the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act (DSHMRA) and President Trump’s executive order to fast-track deep-sea mining permits. The report, how­ever, sees the stock rally as unsustainable, warning of icebergs ahead for TMC’s economic viability.

Icebergs ahead

Iceberg Research compares TMC to Nautilus Miner­als, a failed deep-sea min­ing venture where TMC’s CEO Gerard Barron and founder David Heydon were early investors, reap­ing profits by selling shares before its 2019 bankruptcy. Nautilus went bankrupt after operating costs esca­lated without a pre-feasi­bility study (PFS).

Iceberg warns that TMC is repeating this pattern, lacking a PFS for its Nori-D project in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) despite claiming completion in November 2024, a claim undermined by the absence of expert sign-off by March 2025. A PFS is a critical docu­ment that estimates eco­nomically viable reserves.

Furthermore, Iceberg believes TMC’s econom­ic assumptions are overly optimistic, questioning whether mining in harsh conditions in the deep sea could be cost-competitive with mining metals in open pits onshore. The re­search firm believes this is not the case, and the rea­son why the largest mining companies in the world haven’t shown interest in deep-sea mining.

Commodity prices fur­ther weaken TMC’s case. In 2021 and 2022, metal prices had soared due to fears of supply crunches and increasing demand for elec­tric vehicles. Fast forward to today, and the prices have mostly decreased, and are below TMC’s original assumptions, with copper being an exception. The de­creases are driven by Indo­nesian supply and the rise of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which de­mand fewer metals.

The research firm adds another nail to TMC’s coffin – the nodule col­lection numbers. In 2022, the company conducted a pilot test and reported collecting 4,500 tons of nodules. Their stated sus­tained production rate was 86 tons per hour. Iceberg Research found this num­ber to be significantly less than TMC’s previous as­sumptions of 146 tons per hour.

In summary, Iceberg Research estimates a dev­astating net present value for TMC’s nodule project of negative $721, com­pared to TMC’s initial estimate of $6.8. Conse­quently, Iceberg believes the economics of TMC’s operations are not viable and that the company will face bankruptcy, as Nauti­lus Minerals did.

Previous article
Why peer reviews often don’t work

Related Articles