Photos of an electric submersible pump, which is placed deep in the geothermal production well, before the scaling inhibitor was used (left), and after its implementation (right). Photography: Stadtwerke München.
Geothermal
Europe

Preventing scaling in geothermal production wells

A new innovation has resulted in a significant reduction in project downtime in southern Germany

The Munich area in Germany is lucky when it comes to its geo­thermal potential. There is a good Upper Jurassic car­bonate reservoir at the right depth, and the water com­position is also favourable when it comes to scaling and corrosion. “Howev­er, even though we don’t have the same challenges with scaling as projects have elsewhere, we still face them,” says Benedikt Broda from Stadtwerke München (SWM).

The utility energy com­pany operates six deep geo­thermal projects in the city and Greater Munich Area, three of which suffered from calcium carbonate scaling in the production tubing.

“By not doing anything, we saw a growth of 2 to 3 mm per year in the tub­ing, especially at projects where the temperature of the produced water exceeds 100° C and where flow rates are higher than 100 l/s,” Benedikt says.

In addition, scaling also adversely affects the oper­ation of the ESP, the elec­tronic submersible pump. And that device also hap­pens to be the heart of the geothermal doublets. Re­placing the ESP means the project is at a standstill for more than 10 days, includ­ing the mobilization of all the kit required to lift the pump out of the well. “We used to do this once or twice a year,” Benedikt says, “whilst also doing cleanups of the well to remove the carbonate scale.”

That’s why SWM in­vested in an R&D project to investigate ways to pre­vent scaling from happen­ing, in which Benedikt played a key role. “Start­ing in 2012, we have now found a good candidate, which consists of a bio­degradable polymer that prevents precipitation of carbonates very efficiently. We need less than 1 l of it per hour,” he explains, “against a total pumped volume of water of 400,000 l/hr.”

SWM also developed an innovative way to inject the inhibitor into the pro­duction stream downhole. Rather than using another pump, which is prone to failure as well, they use the downhole versus surface plant pressure difference, which causes the fluid to be injected by itself.

“We tested the inhibi­tor in a bypass circuit first, before starting to inject it in the well below the ESP,” Benedikt explains. “We sub­sequently reduced the dose to set the minimal dosage required to prevent scaling. And now, at one of the pro­jects where we apply the in­hibitor, the production well has been in operation for two years already without any problems. That is a big leap forward.”

And the future is im­portant, as SWM plans to drill 50 more deep geother­mal wells in the years to come. Not all of these will require scaling inhibitors, but a handful will, “and having an adequate solu­tion in place supports the economics of these projects significantly,” Benedikt concludes.

Previous article
The geology of Bronze Age epics
Next article
Can the Netherlands be an attractive option for disillusioned companies on the other side of the median line?

Related Articles