A view of Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, from Nairobi National Park. Photography: Hamidslens via Adobe Stock.

Geothermal
Africa

Too fast, too soon

Thermal breakthrough in geothermal projects is like water breakthrough in oil – with loss of production and possibly entire wells as a result

In Geothermal energy production, it is all about the tem­perature of the produced water, brine or steam. A drop in temperature has a direct effect on the amount of energy that can be extracted.

The timing of thermal breakthrough in a geothermal project depends on a few factors. The proximity of the in­jector well to the producer well plays an important role, as well as the properties of the rocks – are there any high-per­meability zones – and / or the presence of natural recharge through which cooler waters can arrive at the production well? And last but not least, the rate at which geothermal fluids are produced also determines the timing of thermal breakthrough to a significant extent.

It is the latter that seems to have been an issue in Kenya at a couple of the countries’ high-profile geothermal power projects.

Kenya is home to a well-established geothermal produc­tion province in the African Rift, where steam is being pro­duced from moderate depths of around 2,000 m for electric­ity production. As such, Kenya occupies the eighth place in the world when it comes to geothermal energy production, with an estimated capacity near 900 MW.

The question now is whether the 900 MW capacity can be maintained through the existing projects alone. There are signs it will be a challenge. As we reported earlier, the development of the Ol­karia geothermal field has now reached a mature stage, and there is an increasing risk of well interference and drilling of unproductive wells.

And this may have already happened, with early thermal breakthroughs taking place at some key wells across various projects in Kenya.

Reservoir complexities may be one of the reasons why this has happened. At Olkaria, the main reservoir consists of porous and permeable volcanic rocks such as rhyolites, trachytes and basalts. It can be easily envisaged that without mapping of individual flow units, it is hard to predict where “thief zones” are.

It is possible to suspend production from that well and give it time to recover, but without understanding why the breakthrough happened in the first place, it probably will keep occurring.

All of this illustrates that geothermal energy production is not a simple exercise that entails drilling a production and injection well. It needs both geoscience to map out reservoir heterogeneities as well as a reservoir engineering approach to keep tabs on what is happening. This is not to say that these things were ignored in Kenya, but it rather reinforc­es continued vigilance and also illustrates the need to keep thinking about “replace reserves”.

Previous article
How your WhatsApp call helps detect seismic activity
Next article
Speeding up geothermal exploration in Europe

Related Articles