Thermal conductivity of the Jõhvi PA-1 borehole located in the northeast of the country, measured using a distributed temperature sensing cable at 1 m intervals. The “Heating” series was obtained with the help of a heated copper wire using a constant power of 10W/m. The “recovery” data is a passive way of detecting conductivity. It can be seen that the thermal conductivity of the basement is higher than the overlying siliciclastic rocks. Source: Geological Survey of Estonia.

Geothermal
Europe

Geothermal energy from buried basement rocks

A new geothermal research project in Estonia taps into heat stored in basement rocks buried below hundreds of meters of poorly conductive sediments

Closed-loop shallow geo­thermal boreholes drilled up to a depth of around 200 m are quite common in Estonia. But recently, the Geolog­ical Survey decided to embark on a project to tap into deeper geothermal resources by drilling into basement rocks buried beneath an interval of sedimentary strata in the northern part of the country.

The goal of the project is to pro­duce the energy “stored” in basement rocks that are overlain by a succession of siliciclastic sediments. This is based on the concept that a 150 to 300 m thick succession of isolating sedimen­tary rocks forms a barrier for heat to be effectively transferred to surface, leading to relatively high tempera­tures in the topmost part of the igne­ous succession.

In southern Finland, a geolog­ical analogue to northern Estonia, this concept has already been suc­cessfully applied and it is expected that the thermogeological properties are comparable in Estonia, if not superior. For instance, geothermal gradients of up to 35° C / km have been measured in in basement rocks in northern Estonia, compared to 18° C / km in other places. This has resulted in a 5° C temperature anom­aly in the higher gradient areas. Fur­ther drilling is now needed to better map these positive anomalies.

Challenges

While the geo-energy potential in northern Estonia is promising, it comes with its own set of challeng­es. Drilling boreholes through the unconsolidated sedimentary rocks to reach the crystalline basement in­creases costs. However, the economic feasibility demonstrated by similar projects in southern Finland provides a strong incentive to overcome these challenges.

The initial idea was to drill at least 600-700 m boreholes, but the length limitations of U-tube bore­hole heat exchangers restricted the project to 500 m boreholes. However, another way of tapping into deeper strata is now being considered with­out the use of a U-tube pipe. In this case, a single tube will be lowered in the borehole, with water being cir­culated downward through the open hole and subsequently produced back up through the tube. The heat exchanger is then used to transfer the energy from the top of the bore­hole to the low temperature district heating network.

The risk of these open hole circuits is the presence of a fracture system in the basement rocks, with a loss of flu­id as a result. That is why only water is used as a circulation fluid, and work is being done at the same time to find ways to close off the fractures.

Previous article
Does Denmark really want onshore CO2 storage?
Next article
It was not a geologist who found oil at Spindletop

Related Articles